>
> Because it will certainly break by 2038, when 32-bit time_t overflows.
>
> In practice, Unix systems will have to move to 64-bit time_t before
> that, and we'll probably either remove abstime or make it an 8-byte type
> as soon as that practice is common.
Thanks for that. By that time my storage requirements will certainly have
changed, but I guess this transformation won't happen in a hurry... I'd like
to see abstime supported until at least 2020.
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
I have, and it doesn't have an entry on this. Don't know who maintains the
FAQ, but I think it would be worthwhile adding this issue to the FAQ.
--
Kilian Hagemann
Climate Systems Analysis Group
University of Cape Town
Republic of South Africa
Tel(w): ++27 21 650 2748