Re: Should libpq set close-on-exec flag on its socket?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От dom@happygiraffe.net (Dominic Mitchell)
Тема Re: Should libpq set close-on-exec flag on its socket?
Дата
Msg-id 20041022115303.GA62269@ppe.happygiraffe.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Should libpq set close-on-exec flag on its socket?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 02:10:48PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> It was suggested to me off-list that libpq should do
> "fcntl(fd, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC)" on the socket connecting to the server.
> This would prevent any child program from accidentally or maliciously
> interfering with the connection.  It would also prevent people from
> deliberately turning over a connection to a child; I'm not sure that
> that's useful, but I'm not sure it's useless either.
> 
> Comments, opinions?

This is a very good idea.  We've had problems with Perl programs that
call other scripts (over an exec boundary) and end up with unnecessary
DBD::Pg file handles hanging around.  This would be good to prevent
that.

-Dom


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Michael Paesold"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: code question: storing INTO relation
Следующее
От: Robert Treat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: timestamp with time zone a la sql99