Re: a bug in pg_dump?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: a bug in pg_dump?
Дата
Msg-id 20041019190647.GB5625@dcc.uchile.cl
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: a bug in pg_dump?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: a bug in pg_dump?  (Jaime Casanova <systemguards@yahoo.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 02:25:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jaime Casanova <systemguards@yahoo.com> writes:
> > but when i do a: pg_dump -C uescc > uescc.sql
> > it add the create statement for the database but not
> > add appropiates alter database for the parameters i
> > set search_path in this case.
>
> > But, pg_dumpall does.
>
> > a bug in pg_dump?
>
> No.  That functionality is assigned to pg_dumpall.

There doesn't seem to be a way of extracting only database creation from
pg_dumpall.  Or the schema of a single database, for example.  There
_is_ a functionality gap here.


ISTM pg_dump -C (which dumps CREATE DATABASE) should dump ALTER DATABASE
commands too.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
You liked Linux a lot when he was just the gawky kid from down the block
mowing your lawn or shoveling the snow. But now that he wants to date
your daughter, you're not so sure he measures up. (Larry Greenemeier)

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: a bug in pg_dump?
Следующее
От: Jaime Casanova
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: a bug in pg_dump?