Re: plperl features

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> We expected this to a degree of course, but if we can get some of
> them in, it would be nice for the community
> who wants to use plPerl.

On the other hand, it wouldn't be that nice for the community that
respects a good freeze.  As you know, there will always be one more
feature.

Considering that we're already a long time into the beta phase, and
we're still working out portability issues especially in the various
plug-ins, we really ought to be strict about the freeze in that area if
we ever want to get finished.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/