Re: Speeding up DELETEs on table with FKs ...
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Speeding up DELETEs on table with FKs ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20041011033728.J54093@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Speeding up DELETEs on table with FKs ... (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Speeding up DELETEs on table with FKs ...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: >> 'k, now that I've seen the error of my ways *groan* I've gone back >> through, and checked for what is referencing that table, and there is only >> one place that is, and it does have an INDEX: > >>> explain analyze select * from table where raw_id = 20722; >> QUERY PLAN >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Index Scan using ind_raw_id on table (cost=0.00..3.09 rows=1 width=122) (actual time=0.33..0.33 rows=0 loops=1) >> Index Cond: (raw_id = 20722::numeric) >> Total runtime: 0.37 msec > > "numeric", hm? Is the referenced column also of type numeric? Correct, and a join of the two tables appears to use both indices, altho one is of numeric(9,0) and the other numeric(12,0) ... could that difference post a problem from a FK perspective that a SELECT/JOIN wouldn't show? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: