Re: Notes on config-file-locations patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Notes on config-file-locations patch
Дата
Msg-id 200410091916.26217.peter_e@gmx.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Notes on config-file-locations patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Notes on config-file-locations patch  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> The main difference between this and the CVS-tip behavior is that
> if you want to specify the main config file directly, you write
> --config_file instead of -D.  I think that's less confusing than
> overloading -D with multiple meanings.

I seem to recall that this was proposed all along (with the option named 
-C), before it was torn apart and reassembled.  I'm happy with it.

> It wasn't clear to me whether we had a consensus to prevent
> non-superusers from reading the values of these GUC variables.

I think in general operating system details should be hidden from users.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Security implications of config-file-location patch
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1