Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I was thinking of adding %z as an option to log_line prefix, so to get
> > the current output you would do '%t %z'. I was not suggesting changing
> > the %Z passed to strftime if they ask for timezone.
>
> I think this is a bad idea, mainly because you couldn't easily get the
> same output. It would be almost the same, except when you crossed a DST
> boundary in between the two calls to strftime; in which case you'd get a
> completely misleading result.
>
> I believe that in the long run we will stop using the platform-specific
> strftime at all, and go over to using just our own code, which makes
> this not a permanent problem but just an artifact of the fact that we
> haven't completely finished the process of absorbing src/timezone/.
> So I'd rather not invent an API element simply because Windows' strftime
> sucks.
Agreed, and the daylight savings time is a good reason to keep the
timezone.
However, I actually prefer the mail header style of timezone to EST/EDT
anyway:
Fri, 08 Oct 2004 12:37:52 -0400
Ours would change from:
2004-10-08 11:29:30 EDT LOG: database system was shut down at
to2004-10-08 11:29:30 -0400 LOG: database system was shut down at
Is that better?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073