Re: Article about PostgreSQL and RAID in Brazil
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Article about PostgreSQL and RAID in Brazil |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200409161407.37669.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Article about PostgreSQL and RAID in Brazil ("Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Article about PostgreSQL and RAID in Brazil
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Jim, > What about benefits from putting WAL and pg_temp on seperate drives? > Specifically, we have a box with 8 drives, 2 in a mirror with the OS and > WAL and pg_temp; the rest in a raid10 with the database on it. Do you > think it would have been better to make one big raid10? What if it was > raid5? And what if it was only 6 drives total? OSDL's finding was that even with a large RAID array, it still benefits you to have WAL on a seperate disk resource ... substantially, like 10% total performance. However, your setup doesn't get the full possible benefit, since WAL is sharing the array with other resources. -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: