Michael Paesold wrote:
> I though the postgres behaviour of rolling back the whole transaction
> was standard?
No.
> If that is not the case, I don't understand why core
> seems to be against a mode (GUC), where an implicit savepoint is
> generated before each statement so that "rollback of the last
> statement" would be possible.
Because it's dangerous in noninteractive mode. When you send a
transaction to the server, you don't want some statements be left out.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/