Re: Contrib -- PostgreSQL shared variables
| От | Robert Treat |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Contrib -- PostgreSQL shared variables |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200408302158.32439.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Contrib -- PostgreSQL shared variables (pgsql@mohawksoft.com) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday 30 August 2004 09:50, pgsql@mohawksoft.com wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 09:24:59AM -0400, pgsql@mohawksoft.com wrote:
> > What's the advantage of instead stuffing these in-memory variables
> > into PostgreSQL? That it still works correctly and simply even if you
> > have a farm of 10 separate web servers sitting in front of it? That
> > could be useful for certain applications, but is there any more to it
> > than that?
>
> Isn't "that could be useful for certain applications" enough of a reason
> to add something to contrib?
>
That's enough of a reason to add something to *gborg*, but I can think of a
lot of things I would rather see the postgresql major contributors
maintaining than this.. especially when you consider that we've already
removed things like jdbc from contrib.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: