Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates
| От | Robert Treat |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200408300059.38871.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sunday 29 August 2004 18:29, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>
> > On the ordering issues, I'd go for straight alphabetical schema/name
> > sort in all cases; I thought that's where we were already, but if you
> > see some missing cases let's fix it. I'm not enamored of discriminating
> > against system objects in the sort order.
>
> I don't agree with this. We already discriminate against system objects by
> not showing system tables, for example, when doing a \dt. There is no
> reason I should have to scroll through 1500+ system functions using \df
> because I forgot the name of one of the 12 functions I've created, or
> simply because I want to view all 12 quickly.
On the one hand I would have to agree with Greg, and I would point out that by
default in phppgadmin we don't display system functions since it is just too
overbearing.
OTOH I know that I sometimes use /df to look up built in functions that I
don't exactly remember, so keeping a way to access the system functions is
handy.
Given a third hand I'd look for some way to do both... perhaps \df can show
all functions and \df- can show only user created functions?
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: