On Sunday 29 August at 12:34pm, Oliver Elphick had this to say:
> Primary and foreign key constraints are not inherited. This is a defect
> in the current system.
It almost seems like a FEATURE to me, since it creates a different and
easy way to create one-to-many relationships. But I didn't use it,
since the documentation says this is a Bad Thing that may be fixed
some day. If the child table inherits the primary key constraint from
the parent, why not just put it in the same table?
--
Matthew M Davis
<mmd@teledavis.com>