Patch applied. Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>> I understand your disliking of non-posix stuff. OTOH,
> >>GetLastError will
> >>> give much more details than errno.
> >>
> >>How much more, really? That mapping table gave me the impression that
> >>the win32 error codes aren't all that much more detailed than errno...
> >
> >The mapping table is not complete. My winerror.h from the SDK
> >lists 2209
> >error codes, whereas errno.h lists 42...
> >
> >I still don't think we'll get that much more stuff. Right now,
> >the Win32
> >code paths that actually use the more advanced functions already write
> >out the error number in case something happens. We can keep doing that
> >for the other paths (ereport the error *number* when the mapping does
> >not have a match). The map to errno will catch almost all cases, I
> >think. And in the corner cases we can do with just the number, and use
> >"net helpmsg" to get the actual message when checking...
>
> Here's an attempt on this. new file goes in backend/port/win32.
>
> //Magnus
Content-Description: win32error.patch
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
Content-Description: error.c
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073