Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>> Does anyone have any more?
> >
> >> win32 signal safe socket handler
> >
> >I thought that was solved long ago?
>
> If this is what I think it is (Merlin - please confirm), this relates to
> the SSL code only. And the issue is that there are (I think - haven't
> 100% verified it yet) paths in the SSL code that will block withou it
> being possible to deliver signals. The end result would be a query you
> can't cancel/backend you can't kill.
OK, I added an SSL mention:
o fix signal safe socket handler for SSL
>
> The non-SSL codepaths emulate blocking sockets using non-blocking ones
> that also listen on signals. This has not been done for SSL sockets yet.
OK.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073