On Fri, 13 Aug 2004, Jan Wieck wrote:
> Every time PostgreSQL is discussed, be that slashdot or LWN or other
> forums or even interviews with any of out competitors, the statement is
> "doesn't have replication". If we avoid the topic in our 8.0 press
> release and leave out the word replication, instead of pointing to the
> reasons why it is *better not to have replication builtin*, we will
> lose. People will read the press release, don't see the word
> replication, so "No Replication - checkmark".
Except that "Have Replication" to those claiming 'No Replicatin' means
"Integrated with the Server", we still don't *have* Replication in their
minds, no matter how many external projects that do it we mention ;(
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664