On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 12:24:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> My discovery last night of a WAL synchronization error in pg_clog led me
> to take a look at pg_subtrans too. I soon realized that in fact we are
> not WAL-logging pg_subtrans updates at all: subtransaction start sets up
> a pg_subtrans entry but makes no WAL entry for this action.
>
> Seems like this is a problem.
Rats :-(
You are probably right. In fact this was on my todo list and I overlooked
it -- it was mentioned during early discussion.
Right now I am heading to Bolivia for a conference, so I am not able to
do anything codewise right now, and I'll most likely have very intermitent
connection ... I'll be back on monday 16.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[@]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Estoy de acuerdo contigo en que la verdad absoluta no existe...
El problema es que la mentira sí existe y tu estás mintiendo" (G. Lama)