BIGINT indexes still with problems
От | Dan Ruthers |
---|---|
Тема | BIGINT indexes still with problems |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040809031829.93971E5BC7@ws7-2.us4.outblaze.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: BIGINT indexes still with problems
(Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>)
Re: BIGINT indexes still with problems (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>) Re: BIGINT indexes still with problems (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Hi, I have read in this list and elsewhere the problem with indexes and big int. Still, I have an index that is used or not, depending of the parameter value used in the query. I am using PostgreSQL 7.4.3 on Linux RH ES3. Here's the table: test=> \d dmaildatum Table "public.dmaildatum" Column | Type | Modifiers ----------------+-----------------------------+----------- id | bigint | not null type | integer | not null idowneruser | bigint | not null idparent | bigint | not null creationdate | timestamp without time zone | not null name | character varying(1024) | not null deletedate | timestamp without time zone | not null lastmodifydate | timestamp without time zone | ffrom | character varying(255) | fto | text | fcc | text | fbcc | text | fsubject | text | fdate | timestamp without time zone | fread | boolean | nattachments | integer | fsize | bigint | hashtml | boolean | replyto | text | pop3id | character varying(255) | nvattachments | integer | Indexes: "dmaildatum_pkey" primary key, btree (id) "ix_dmaildatum_fdate" btree (fdate) "ix_dmaildatum_idowneruser" btree (idowneruser) "ix_dmaildatum_idparent" btree (idparent) "ix_dmaildatum_pop3id" btree (pop3id) Foreign-key constraints: "fk_dmaildatum_dmailfolderdatum" FOREIGN KEY (idparent) REFERENCES dmailfold erdatum(id) ON DELETE CASCADE Now, if I run this query (note the int8 cast - also tried with the '' cast to String, same results): test=> explain select * from dmaildatum where idparent=int8(783219); QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------ Seq Scan on dmaildatum (cost=0.00..2241.71 rows=2229 width=272) Filter: (idparent = 783219::bigint) (2 rows) The index is not used. But with an identical query, only different parameter value: desknow=> explain select * from dmaildatum where idparent=int8(1187838); QUERY PLAN -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- Index Scan using ix_dmaildatum_idparent on dmaildatum (cost=0.00..284.05 rows= 102 width=272) Index Cond: (idparent = 1187838::bigint) (2 rows) The index is used! I also did a vacuum analyze, and restarted Postgres and it did not make any difference. I tried many other ID values (ex 783218 and 783220), and they seem to use the index correctly. Only that value doesn't. Can anyone explain why Postgres behaves differently in these two cases, or at least point to some hints? Thanks in advance for all your help -- _______________________________________________ Find what you are looking for with the Lycos Yellow Pages http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default.asp?SRC=lycos10
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:
Предыдущее
От: Gaetano MendolaДата:
Сообщение: Re: Copy data from one table to another, where some records might