Tom Lane wrote:
> > ftok() on pg_control or something in the clusters data directory was my
> > intention. (Again, just one message queue)
>
> Doesn't work; you have to be able to cope with collisions with
> previously existing queue IDs ... so in practice the queue ID has to
> be treated as quasi-random. See the semaphore ID selection logic
> we use now.
>
> I tend to agree with Bruce's nearby comment that we shouldn't be trying
> to solve this now. I'd vote for commenting out the session-kill
> function for 7.5, and revisiting the issue sometime in future.
I already have it on the TODO list.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073