Re: win32 version info

Tom Lane wrote:
> I was originally thinking of somehow migrating the executable build
> rules into a single pattern rule, but given the lack of any suffix on
> executable names it's not clear how to use a pattern rule for the
> purpose.

You can write a rule for that using

%: %.o

but...

> And the existing rules are diverse enough that it might be
> a real pain to construct such a pattern rule anyway.

...is the problem.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/