Re: Bug in concat operator for Char? -- More Info
| От | Stephan Szabo |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Bug in concat operator for Char? -- More Info |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20040721075621.T61440@megazone.bigpanda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Bug in concat operator for Char? -- More Info (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Bug in concat operator for Char? -- More Info
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > > Are these changes intentional, > > Yes. We've been moving more and more steadily towards the notion that > trailing spaces in char(n) values are insignificant noise. If you think > that trailing spaces are significant, you shouldn't be using char(n) > to store them. Well, the problem here is that technically we're returning the wrong type. We should be returning a char(l1+l2) rather than a text for a char concatenate, but similarly to the recent complaint about numerics, we don't really have a fully proper way to do that and it seems non-trivial.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: