Re: Is "trust" really a good default?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Is "trust" really a good default?
Дата
Msg-id 200407152317.47506.peter_e@gmx.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Is "trust" really a good default?  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
Ответы Re: Is "trust" really a good default?
Список pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Certainly, I'm not saying it shuold change (I've given that up by
> now). But the difference would be that if you used -W with initdb, it
> would change the default *for that installation*.
> Initdb-with-no-parameters would stay the same to keep people who
> don't know about the switches happier.

The fallacy with this line of thought is that it assumes that one 
authentication scheme applies to all ways of connecting.  Often, the 
postgres account is not password protected for local access, for the 
benefit of autovacuum and that sort of maintenance.  Still I might like 
passwords for remote access.  The bottom line is, the user has to 
figure this out himself.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Magnus Hagander"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Weird new time zone
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Note about robustness of transaction-related data structures