Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Log Message:
> > > -----------
> > > Have \dn+ show permissions and description for schemas.
> >
> > Did we agree on this? It's now inconsistent with tables and other
> > objects.
>
> No one disagreed that I remember. How are we inconsistent exactly?
Dennis asked for opinions about how to name the command. There were
other opinions offered. The patch was just an example, without a
decision on the name of the command.
The inconsistency is that there is a separate "show permissions" command
for tables, but for schemas it's now under "extra information". Now we
can't be sure where the permission information for the next object will
end up. That's not good.