What was the conclusion for PREPARE done inside transactions?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jeroen T. Vermeulen" <jtv@xs4all.nl> writes:
> > I think we're talking at cross purposes here... If the client doesn't use
> > explicit transactions, as you say is common, then you're obviously not
> > defining prepared statements inside explicit transactions either.
>
> This whole discussion seems to be considering only the case of PREPAREs
> issued as SQL statements, by a programmer who is fully cognizant of
> where he's beginning and ending transactions.
>
> The issue I was trying to raise at the beginning of the thread was: what
> about prepared statements created by client libraries (think JDBC for
> instance) using the V3 protocol Parse message? Rolling back a
> successful prepare because of a later transaction failure seems like
> exactly not what such a library would want.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073