Forcing HashAggregation prior to index scan?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Eugene
Тема Forcing HashAggregation prior to index scan?
Дата
Msg-id 20040705231434.81471.qmail@web50708.mail.yahoo.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Forcing HashAggregation prior to index scan?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-performance
I have a very simple problem. I run two select statments, they are identical except for a single
where condition. The first select statment runs in 9 ms, while the second statment runs for 4000
ms

SQL1 - fast 9ms
explain analyse select seq_ac from refseq_sequence S where seq_ac in (select seq_ac2 from
refseq_refseq_hits where seq_ac1 = 'NP_001217')

SQL2 - very slow  4000ms
explain analyse select seq_ac from refseq_sequence S where seq_ac in (select seq_ac2 from
refseq_refseq_hits where seq_ac1 = 'NP_001217') AND S.species = 'Homo sapiens'

I think the second sql statment is slower than the first one because planner is not using
HashAggregate. Can I force HashAggregation before index scan?

Here is the full output from EXPLAIN ANALYZE

explain analyse select seq_ac from refseq_sequence S where seq_ac in (select seq_ac2 from
refseq_refseq_hits where seq_ac1 = 'NP_001217');
                                                                            QUERY PLAN

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Nested Loop  (cost=169907.83..169919.88 rows=3 width=24) (actual time=1.450..8.707 rows=53
loops=1)
   ->  HashAggregate  (cost=169907.83..169907.83 rows=2 width=19) (actual time=1.192..1.876
rows=53 loops=1)
         ->  Index Scan using refseq_refseq_hits_pkey on refseq_refseq_hits  (cost=0.00..169801.33
rows=42600 width=19) (actual time=0.140..0.894 rows=54 loops=1)
               Index Cond: ((seq_ac1)::text = 'NP_001217'::text)
   ->  Index Scan using refseq_sequence_pkey on refseq_sequence s  (cost=0.00..6.01 rows=1
width=24) (actual time=0.105..0.111 rows=1 loops=53)
         Index Cond: ((s.seq_ac)::text = ("outer".seq_ac2)::text)
 Total runtime: 9.110 ms



explain analyse select seq_ac from refseq_sequence S where seq_ac in (select seq_ac2 from
refseq_refseq_hits where seq_ac1 = 'NP_001217') and S.species = 'Homo sapiens';
                                                                        QUERY PLAN

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Nested Loop IN Join  (cost=0.00..4111.66 rows=1 width=24) (actual time=504.176..3857.340 rows=30
loops=1)
   ->  Index Scan using refseq_sequence_key2 on refseq_sequence s  (cost=0.00..1516.06 rows=389
width=24) (actual time=0.352..491.107 rows=27391 loops=1)
         Index Cond: ((species)::text = 'Homo sapiens'::text)
   ->  Index Scan using refseq_refseq_hits_pkey on refseq_refseq_hits  (cost=0.00..858.14 rows=213
width=19) (actual time=0.114..0.114 rows=0 loops=27391)
         Index Cond: (((refseq_refseq_hits.seq_ac1)::text = 'NP_001217'::text) AND
(("outer".seq_ac)::text = (refseq_refseq_hits.seq_ac2)::text))
 Total runtime: 3857.636 ms

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Missner, T. R."
Дата:
Сообщение: inserting into brand new database faster than old database
Следующее
От: Edoardo Ceccarelli
Дата:
Сообщение: finding a max value