Actually, this is the current state of this issue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> writes:
> >
> >
> >>>Answering my own question, the distribution of the current logfile
> >>>name could be done trough a file handle.
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> >>would you mind commenting on my suggestion so I can continue on that topic?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >There is no portable way to redistribute a file handle.
> >
> >
>
> Seems I didn't make clear enough what I mean.
>
> I'd fopen a file handle in the postmaster, and all subsequent processes
> will inherit that handle just as they do for stderr; no redistribution
> required.
> The log filename is written to that file when pg_logfile_rotate is called:
> fseek(fh, 0, SEEK_SET);
> fprintf(fh, "%s", newlogfilname);
> fflush();
>
> and all subprocesses may retrieve the filename when required by
>
> char buf[MAXPGPATH];
> fseek(fh, 0, SEEK_SET);
> fread(buf, 1, MAXPGPATH, fh);
> buf[MAXPGPATH-1]=0; // prevent buffer overflow
> logfile=fopen(buf, "a+");
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
>
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073