Re: ORDER BY user defined function performance issues
| От | Paul Thomas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: ORDER BY user defined function performance issues |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20040611144108.A28875@bacon обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | ORDER BY user defined function performance issues (Nick Trainor <nick.trainor@trainorthornton.co.uk>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On 11/06/2004 12:14 Nick Trainor wrote:
> [snip]
> However, when I seek to ORDER the results, then it takes 'forever':
>
> EXPLAIN ANALYSE SELECT t1.value1,t1.value2,
> getday_total('1','23',t1.id::integer,'31','59','2','2004','182','153','6','2004','0')
> FROM tblitem t1 WHERE t1.type_id=23::int2 and (t1.id >= 1::int8 and
> t1.id<=9223372036854775807::int8)
> ORDER BY
> getday_total('1','23',t1.id::integer,'31','59','2','2004','182','153','6','2004','0')
> DESC
> OFFSET 0 LIMIT 20;
I expect that pg is having to evaluate your function every time it does a
compare within its sort. Something like
SELECT t1.value1,t1.value2,
getday_total(..) AS foo
FROM tblitem t1 WHERE t1.type_id=23::int2 and (t1.id >= 1::int8 and
t1.id<=9223372036854775807::int8)
ORDER BY foo
might work. Otherwise try selecting into a temp table then doing the order
by on that table.
HTH
--
Paul Thomas
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
| Thomas Micro Systems Limited | Software Solutions for
Business |
| Computer Consultants |
http://www.thomas-micro-systems-ltd.co.uk |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: