Re: Build failure on m68k and ia64: inconsistent operand constraints in an `asm'

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Build failure on m68k and ia64: inconsistent operand constraints in an `asm'
Дата
Msg-id 200406101204.20605.peter_e@gmx.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Build failure on m68k and ia64: inconsistent operand constraints in an `asm'  (Martin Pitt <martin@piware.de>)
Ответы Re: Build failure on m68k and ia64: inconsistent operand constraints in an `asm'
Список pgsql-ports
Martin Pitt wrote:
> A Debian porter suggested that "1"(*lock) is an obsolete syntax and
> should be replaced by "m"(*lock) in both cases; however, I would like
> to get a second opinion about this.

If it were obsolete syntax, then it would still work.  As it is, they
are treating it as invalid syntax, which is really a bad move on their
part.


В списке pgsql-ports по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Martin Pitt
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Build failure on m68k and ia64: inconsistent operand constraints in an `asm'
Следующее
От: Martin Pitt
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Build failure on m68k and ia64: inconsistent operand constraints in an `asm'