Re: int4/int8 problem with jdbc was Re: "Fix" for INT8 literals
От | Paul Thomas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: int4/int8 problem with jdbc was Re: "Fix" for INT8 literals |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040602142721.A432@bacon обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: int4/int8 problem with jdbc was Re: "Fix" for INT8 literals (Jan Heise <jan@janheise.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: int4/int8 problem with jdbc was Re: "Fix" for INT8 literals
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On 02/06/2004 12:47 Jan Heise wrote: > oliver, thanks for your reply. > > the db in question is a 7.4 site in production. upgrading to another > version is not really what i'd like > to do. the explicit cast is problematic too, i'm using hibernate as my > orm. unless i missed something > in the docs, i can not add the cast to the config - but this is sth. for > the hibernate forums. > > the problem is a special case where i have to load objects from the > table in question by the pk > (details would be quite long, but i can not change the table-structure > at this time). table size is > approx. 120 million rows and approx 2 million rows have a pk < INT4_MAX. > so i think my only > option is dropping the foreign keys, making the pks and all references > bigger than INT4_MAX > and recreate the fk. > > jan There's an unofficial patch: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2003-09/msg00143.php which might solve your problems for now. IIRC, there's a server-side patch been submitted which will solve the int4/int8 issue and may be 7.5. -- Paul Thomas +------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+ | Thomas Micro Systems Limited | Software Solutions for Business | | Computer Consultants | http://www.thomas-micro-systems-ltd.co.uk | +------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: