Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > We already have --disable-rpath. Seems we would just need something
> > to use the *.a files.
>
> I think it is perfectly sufficient to say that if you want a relocatable
> install, don't use rpath. Static linking will lead to all other kinds
> of madness.
OK, but if we don't use rpath, don't we have to do the ld.so.conf or
environment varaible usage so we can find our shared library. I assume
the big problem with rpath is that it might find the wrong version of
our library, right? Is there another downside to it being set?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073