Re: First two requests for PUGs

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Marc,
>
> > Can we come up with a standard naming convention for PUG lists first?
> > pgsql-* is the PostgreSQL lists, pgadmin-* is for PgAdmin ... maybe pug-*
> > for PUGs?
>
> I'd go for that.

k, so .. ? :)

first off, should we change sfpug to pug-sf, with an alias from
sfpug->pug-sf, so that it falls under the convention?

second, pug-? for the two new lists?

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664