Re: Updates not atomic with respect to indexes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ben Young
Тема Re: Updates not atomic with respect to indexes
Дата
Msg-id 200404281353.24643.ben@transversal.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Updates not atomic with respect to indexes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
On Wednesday 28 April 2004 13:37, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I believe this is meant to be covered by this TODO item:
>
> * Allow DEFERRABLE UNIQUE constraints
>
> because the real issue is that the uniqueness check occurs immediately
> rather than being deferred till end of statement or transaction.
>
> Dunno when it will rise to the top of anyone's priority list...
>
>             regards, tom lane


Thanks for everyones responses. I guess for now I will just need to find a way
around it. Looking forward to deferrable unique contraints though!

Ben


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Updates not atomic with respect to indexes
Следующее
От: Ned Lilly
Дата:
Сообщение: docs search not working?