Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> > Most of your suggestions are agreeable; a few minor quibbles follow.
>
> >> lfirstcell new function to get first cell, or NULL if none
> > [...]
> >> llastnode llastcell
>
> > What do you think of list_head() and list_tail() instead?
>
> No strong objection, though I thought it was a good idea to include
> "cell" in the function names to suggest that what you are getting back
> is just a cell and not a List. Anyone else have a preference?
I never liked "cell" myself. It is too vague to me. But I see your
point that list_head you would think returns the head of the list, not
the first element in the list. Maybe list_first and list_last?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073