Re: using index on comparison with bit-operation?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: using index on comparison with bit-operation?
Дата
Msg-id 200404082259.i38Mxph02515@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: using index on comparison with bit-operation?  (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 06:01:03 -0700,
>   Michael Groth <geek_1981@yahoo.de> wrote:
> > hi,
> > 
> > is it possible to use an index on the expression '(table_1.field &
> > table_2.field)::int > 0' ?
> > 
> > here's the whole query:
> > 
> > SELECT 
> >     COUNT(*)
> > FROM
> >     users AS users
> > JOIN
> >     search_profile AS search_profile ON
> > (search_profile.bin_matching_field_0 &
> > users.bin_matching_field_0)::int > 0
> > WHERE
> >     users.id = 190
> 
> In 7.4 you can create indexes on expressions.

But it uses two different tables.  You can't mix tables in an index, can
you?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: using index on comparison with bit-operation?
Следующее
От: Kevin Brown
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Function to kill backend