Re: [ADMIN] Raw devices vs. Filesystems

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: [ADMIN] Raw devices vs. Filesystems
Дата
Msg-id 200404070909.16123.josh@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [ADMIN] Raw devices vs. Filesystems  (Grega Bremec <gregab@noviforum.si>)
Ответы Re: [ADMIN] Raw devices vs. Filesystems  (Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>)
Re: [ADMIN] Raw devices vs. Filesystems  (Grega Bremec <gregab@noviforum.si>)
Список pgsql-performance
Grega,

> Furthermore, this filesystem would be a blazing one stop solution for
> all replication issues PostgreSQL currently suffers from, as its main
> design goal was to present "a consistent file system image across the
> servers in a cluster".

Does it work, though?   Without Oracle admin tools?

> Now, if both goals can be achieved in one go, hell, I'm willing to try
> it out myself in an attempt to extract off of it, some performance
> indicators that could be compared to other database performance tests
> sent to both this and the PERFORM mailing list.

Hey, any test you wanna run is fine with us.    I'm pretty sure that OCFS
belongs to Oracle, though, patent & copyright, so we couldn't actually use it
in practice.

If your intention in this test is to show the superiority of raw devices, let
me give you a reality check: barring some major corporate backing getting
involved, we can't possibly implement our own PG-FS for database support.  We
already have a TODO list which is far too long for our developer pool, and
implementing a custom FS either takes a large team (OCFS) or several years of
development (Reiser).

Now, if you know somebody who might pay for one, then great ....

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Aaron Werman"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: good pc but bad performance,why?
Следующее
От: Steve Atkins
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [ADMIN] Raw devices vs. Filesystems