Back to Linux 2.6 kernel thoughts...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Richard Huxton
Тема Back to Linux 2.6 kernel thoughts...
Дата
Msg-id 200404061401.23189.dev@archonet.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Список pgsql-performance
I seem to remember discussion of anticipatory vs deadline scheduler in 2.6.
Here is what Andrew Morton (I think) says:

"The deadline scheduler has two additional scheduling queues that were not
available to the 2.4 IO scheduler. The two new queues are a FIFO read queue
and a FIFO write queue. This new multi-queue method allows for greater
interactivity by giving the read requests a better deadline than write
requests, thus ensuring that applications rarely will be delayed by read
requests.

Deadline scheduling is best suited for database servers and high disk
performance systems. Morton has experienced up to 15 percent increases on
database loads while using deadline scheduling."

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=75&e=2&u=/nf/20040405/tc_nf/23603

Nothing very in-depth in the story.

--
  Richard Huxton
  Archonet Ltd

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bill Moran
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: good pc but bad performance,why?
Следующее
От: Shridhar Daithankar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: performance comparission postgresql/ms-sql server