Re: logging statement levels

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: logging statement levels
Дата
Msg-id 200403310242.i2V2gB000840@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на logging statement levels  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: logging statement levels  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > If nobody is working on this I am prepared to look at it:
> >
> > . Allow logging of only data definition(DDL), or DDL and modification 
> > statements
> >
> 
> 
> 
> Here are some options:
> 
> 1. change the type of "log_statement" option from boolean to string, 
> with allowed values of "all, mod, ddl, none" with default "none".
> 2. same as 1. but make boolean true values synonyms for "all" and 
> boolean false values synonyms for "none".
> 3. keep "log_statement" option as now and add a new option 
> "log_statement_level" with the same options as 1. but default to "all", 
> which will have no effect unless "log_statement" is true.

I like 1.

> Also, I assume "modification statements" means insert/update/delete, or 

Yes.

> are we talking about DDL mods (like "alter table")?

Alter is DDL.

> Finally, what about functions that have side effects? It would be nice 
> to be able to detect the statements to be logged at the syntactic level, 
> but it strikes me that that might not be possible.

Not possible.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump end comment
Следующее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: with vs without oids in pg_catalog.*