Re: pgFoundry

Josh Berkus wrote:
> The only thing which was not discussed was the domain, which we
> regarded as incidental to the installation, which I already
> mentioned, and I apologize for not figuring out that people would
> have an opinion about it.

That was my point and evidently you were mistaken.  If the domain name
were incidental, then we might as well have stuck with gborg, because
that is what many people are used to.

Everybody had agreed to <project>.postgresql.net, and now it's gone
without explanation.