Re: Default Stats Revisited
| От | Robert Treat |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Default Stats Revisited |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200403111755.31689.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Default Stats Revisited (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Default Stats Revisited
Re: Default Stats Revisited |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday 11 March 2004 14:17, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Tom,
>
> > Maybe you should ask on -admin or -general. Personally I thought there
> > wasn't anything to say until someone did some experiments to show
> > whether an indexed-column differential is really worthwhile and what a
> > plausible default value would be. The idea sounds good in the abstract,
> > but will it really help or just be another useless setting?
>
> Yeah, that's our next step, a test.
>
> On Monday, I hope to have comparative stats for a difficult database on
> the 3 solutions (leaving things as-is, raising the general default stats,
> and doing index_stats).
Do you plan on handeling primary key columns differently (since they are
likely to be unique and indexed) ?
Also how will you handle column that are part of expressional indexes (where
foo is true for example) ?
Final thought... I'm a DBA and I think the straight number is simpler, though
could be convinced to go with whichever is higher...
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: