It seems "NOWAIT" is the winner...
--
Tatsuo Ishii
> Oracle uses "NOWAIT" so we should go for that one.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
>
> Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > If "NOWAIT" is the choice, I could live with it. If there's no
> > objection, I will go with "NOWAIT", not "NO WAIT".
> > --
> > Tatsuo Ishii
> >
> >
> >>Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes:
> >>
> >>>LOCK TABLE table NO WAIT is OK for 7.5? If ok, I will make patches
> >>>against current with some docs changes.
> >>
> >>Dept of minor gripes: can we do this without turning "NO" into a
> >>keyword? Even as a nonreserved word, I think that would be annoying.
> >>"no" is a common abbreviation for "number" so I think it's likely to
> >>get used as a column name.
> >>
> >>If Oracle spells it "NOWAIT" then I'd be much happier with that...
> >>
> >> regards, tom lane
> >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org
>
>
> --
> Cybertec Geschwinde u Schoenig
> Schoengrabern 134, A-2020 Hollabrunn, Austria
> Tel: +43/2952/30706 or +43/664/233 90 75
> www.cybertec.at, www.postgresql.at, kernel.cybertec.at
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>