Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200402270020.37548.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| Список | pgsql-www |
Josh Berkus wrote: > The question is, do we need BZ right off or should we try GForge's > lightweight tool first? Personally I find that BZ is a little > intimidating to new users, particularly for searching on issues; as a > result it tends to lead to a lot of duplicate filings. I think we had previously decided that we will not allow a random user off the street to file bug reports into whatever system we end up using. I see it primarily as a bug *tracking* system, not a bug *reporting* system.
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: