Re: Pl/Java - next step?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Pl/Java - next step?
Дата
Msg-id 200402231714.09095.peter_e@gmx.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Pl/Java - next step?  ("Thomas Hallgren" <thhal@mailblocks.com>)
Ответы Re: Pl/Java - next step?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> 1. Select Pl/Java_JNI.
> 2. Select Pl/Java_remote
> 3. Choose both and agree on the SQL + Java semantics
> 4. Make the postmaster spawn threads rather than processes
> (controversial? Nah :-) )

Option 5 (or 0) would be to use GCJ.  This is likely to be the fastest 
and most lightweight solution, but perhaps not the most featureful.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Shridhar Daithankar
Дата:
Сообщение: Thread safe connection-name mapping in ECPG. Is it required?
Следующее
От: "Thomas Hallgren"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Pl/Java - next step?