Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I propose we not break existing applications. If we change it the way
> >> you suggest, there'll be no way to do the above.
>
> > But does anyone use such a capability?
>
> What, you're going to remove a feature because you don't think it's
> used? We've been burnt by that approach before.
Yes. We get burnt by it, but we also remove stuff we don't get burnt
by, so it is a value judgement.
> > The program has to generate \. to terminate the input
>
> No it doesn't. EOF will do fine. The source program doesn't
> necessarily have to know anything about COPY, as long as its output is
> in a format COPY can cope with (eg, tab-delimited).
The current behavior seems quite strange and counter-intuitive. We
might break the code for 1-2 people, but we will make it more
predicable for everyone using it.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073