Re: RFC: Security documentation

Alex J. Avriette wrote:
> That having been said, I would have submitted a patch with said
> documentation if I knew where to start. I have submitted this RFC --
> a request for comments, nothing more serious than that -- because I'd
> like to know what we can do to get some documentation included in the
> next release. I don't feel that having zero documentation on this
> subject is acceptable.

I don't think that such information, while certainly worthwhile, belongs 
into the PostgreSQL documentation, especially because it would cover 
things that are not even included in PostgreSQL, such as DBD::Pg or PHP 
or some mysterious generic "applications".  But in any case it's more 
important to actually write something than worry about where or how it 
will be published.