Re: fix memcpy() overlap
| От | Stephan Szabo |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: fix memcpy() overlap |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20040202132041.M61426@megazone.bigpanda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: fix memcpy() overlap (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: fix memcpy() overlap
Re: fix memcpy() overlap Re: fix memcpy() overlap |
| Список | pgsql-patches |
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Tom Lane wrote: > Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes: > > I don't know of a memcpy() implementation that would actually bail out > > if called with two equal pointers, but perhaps there is one in > > existence somewhere. > > This isn't a bug, and I see no reason to clutter the code just to shut > up valgrind. Isn't memcpy on overlapping (even entirely overlapping) buffers undefined behavior unless the count is 0?
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: