Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Peter: this looks very nice. What are your intentions with this code?
Once we figure out how to handle the on-the-wire character set recoding
when faced with XML documents (see separate thread a few weeks ago), I
would like to finish it.
> Put it in contrib? Also, do you intend to implement the SQL/XML
> functions XMLElement, XMLForest, XMLAttributes, XMLConcat and XMLAgg?
You have to implement these directly in the parser, which I'm not yet
excited about.