Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64
| От | George Essig |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20040127175236.5176.qmail@web80203.mail.yahoo.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64 ("Dave Thompson" <dave@hub.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
> Hello All > > Just wanted to gather opinions on what file system has the best balance between performance and > reliability when used on a quad processor machine running SuSE64. Thanks > > DAve I was reading the article 'Behind the ALTIX 3000' in the Feb. 2003 Linux Journal, and it mentioned the following paper which compares Ext2, Ext3, ReiserFS, XFS, and JFS: Filesystem Performance and Scalability in Linux 2.4.17 Originally published in Proceedings of the FREENIX Track: 2002 USENIX Annual Technical Conference http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/papers/filesystem-perf-tm.pdf Quoting the abtract: Although the best-performing filesystem varies depending on the benchmark and system used, some larger trends are evident in the data. On the smaller systems, the best-performing file system is often Ext2, Ext3 or ReiserFS. For the larger systems and higher loads, XFS can provide the best overall performance. George Essig
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: