Re: Disaster!

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Disaster!
Дата
Msg-id 200401261804.i0QI4CY10530@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Disaster!  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Disaster!  (Christoph Haller <ch@rodos.fzk.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> I said:
> > If there wasn't disk space enough to hold the clog page, the checkpoint
> > attempt should have failed.  So it may be that allowing a short read in
> > slru.c would be patching the symptom of a bug that is really elsewhere.
> 
> After more staring at the code, I have a theory.  SlruPhysicalWritePage
> and SlruPhysicalReadPage are coded on the assumption that close() can
> never return any interesting failure.  However, it now occurs to me that
> there are some filesystem implementations wherein ENOSPC could be
> returned at close() rather than the preceding write().  (For instance,
> the HPUX man page for close() states that this never happens on local
> filesystems but can happen on NFS.)  So it'd be possible for
> SlruPhysicalWritePage to think it had successfully written a page when
> it hadn't.  This would allow a checkpoint to complete :-(
> 
> Chris, what's your platform exactly, and what kind of filesystem are
> you storing pg_clog on?

We already have a TODO on fclose():
* Add checks for fclose() failure

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Matthew Kirkwood
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Named arguments in function calls
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Disaster!