Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question
Дата
Msg-id 200401230455.i0N4tWJ01496@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com> writes:
> > Tom Lane writes:
> >> I'm not sure there's any need for
> >> src/backend/port/win32/sema.c at all.
> 
> > (Do you have any idea on the historical
> > context of this code? I wondered as to, if we have no win32 port, why there
> > would be a seemingly good-to-go sema replacement?)
> 
> [cvs is your friend...]  It appears to have been added as part of the
> MinGW porting work last May.  I don't have much faith in it; as far as
> I heard the MinGW port never got further than making the client-side
> code work, and so this file has no real-world testing.

Right, that is from PeerDirect's Win32 port, with a little cleanup.  It
should work fine, or we can wack it around.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question