On Thursday 15 January 2004 15:25, you wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> I'm not sure what state of play is here?
>
> Are you saying this is intended behavour and therefore not a bug, in
> which case I'll implement one of the work around solutions rather than
> wait for a patch that prevents invalid SQL from executing valid sub
> transactions.
I'm saying it _could_ be considered a feature rather than a bug, but the
people who will know more than me will be hanging out on the jdbc list.
It's entirely possible that someone there will go "oh, that - you just need to
...."
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd