Re: sql insert function
| От | Richard Huxton |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: sql insert function |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200401131853.31515.dev@archonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: sql insert function ("Chris Ochs" <chris@paymentonline.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Tuesday 13 January 2004 17:46, Chris Ochs wrote: > Yes it was in my function. I thought the docs said that BEGIN and END had > no effect on transactions though? Plus wouldn't there have to be a > transaction active since I was not using autocommit and the inserts did in > fact commit? > > I suspect it is the end statement doing this though, I'll take it out and > see what happens. I think you're right - I looked back at your earlier posts and you are mixing up plpgsql and sql function syntax (easy enough to do). BEGIN...END bracket the body of a plpgsql function, but control a transaction in the SQL function. The BEGIN would have been ignored, the END would have committed the current transaction. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: